Alternate Explanations of Dibble History

Documentation for Jonathan Dibble's parentage of our line

The source was a web page created by Lynn Bernhard, which referred to a family group sheet prepared by David W. Dibble, 676 3rd Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT who cited "'Dibble Family' by Van Buren Lamb in 'Your Ancestry' p 144 209 210". The website was discoverd by George A. Dibble III. However, the Lamb pages cited do not mention this Jonathan/Jonathon. The information from those pages does appear on the Mormon Family Search online database, along with unverified links that connect this Jonathan/Jonathon to the Deeble line. The latter probably came from the same source as Bernhard's information.

Return to the narrative

The "Jessup Book"

"Edward Jessup Geneology" may be available on microfilm from the Mormon Family History Library (FHL). The call number cited by Bernhard is 929.273J 499j, however no such call number appears in connection with any of the 44 Jessup family history sources listed on the website. The closest matches are:

A Look Back: Jessup - Bird - Shideler, by Jean S. Bird; call number 929.273 J499bj

The Sixtieth Wedding Anniversary of Mr. and Mrs. Frank P. Jessup, and a Jessup Family History, 1500-1976, by Mary Alice Burchfield; call number 929.273 J499b

John Van Duzer Jessup, 1856-1939 and Abbie Elaine Goodale Jessup, 1868-1962, Their Lives, Their Children, Their Ancestors, by John G. Jessup; call number 929.273 J499a

Edward Jessup And His Descendants is apparently not the same document, since it has no call number at all. However, there are two microfilms of it: US/CAN Film 547584 Item 1 and US/CAN Film 924646 Item 2, in the FHL.

Return to the narrative

Could John[ny] be good [for it]?

The John Dibble in Reverend Jesup's book may have been the John Dibble who was the son of Ebenezer Dibble and Mary Wakefield, which would make him a descendant of Robert Deeble. This John was born on February 9 in 1672 or 1673 in Windsor, CT and married Mary Severence on November 26, 1697. He is documented to have been in Bedford, Westchester, NY in May 1702 (George A. Dibble III family tree). However, his only children recorded by Van Buren Lamb, Jr. were a daughter, Abigail and a son, John, born in 1702. Also, his date of death is given as "about" 1710, the year before Jonathan/Jonathon's birth (though that date, even if correct, does not absolutely preclude paternity). The "Dibble Family folder", prepared by H. W. Brainard, in the archives of the Connecticut Historical Society, said this John had a "Son Jonathan, born about 1711, perhaps others." (Westchester Patriarchs assigns him another daughter, Mary, who was living in about 1715.) Other John Dibbles in the Robert Deeble line who could have been alive and in the area when Jonathan/Jonathon was conceived are also listed in the LDS archives, but some of these are clearly confused with other records, and none of them are as well documented as this one.

Return to the narrative

When did Mary Buel die?

A quotation supplied by Dorothea Butler Macnamara (descended from Jonathan/Jonathon's daughter Abigail), source unknown, states: "1706 Jan 8, the wife of George Dibble having lain in about 3 weeks sitting up and finely well was taken & died about 11 in ye morning taken first cold in one foot." The LDS records simply give Mary's death as "January 1705/1706", which is what Lamb recorded.

Return to the narrative

"Verified" sources aren't what they're cracked up to be.

The fact that the "unverified" source provides more detail about the first marriage than the "verified" source provides about the second suggests that something may be amiss here.

Absolute proof that something is definitely amiss can be seen in the LDS's citation that both Mary and Abigail are said to have given birth to our Jonathan/Jonathon, in 1711.

Van Buren Lamb, Jr., while reporting Israel as George's father, thought that this George may have been confused in the records with a George who was born to Thomas' son Thomas, Jr. He also says that one source reported that Israel's children went to Easthampton, Long Island (where Jonathan/Jonathon may have been baptized). Lamb documents George's marriage to Mary Buel/Buell and her death, but he does not mention Abigail, a second marriage for George, or a connection from them to Jonathan/Jonathon.

This story may have resulted from someone's early confusion of different Georges and Jonathans, errors that have been copied and perpetuated down through the generations. Or, the story may be true. Efforts to track down the original source of this connection are continuing. For now, this connection to Robert Deeble, though perhaps the most likely, must, like all other stories about Jonathan/Jonathon's parentage, be treated as speculation.

Return to the narrative

When did Jonathan/Jonathon Dibble die?

The source for this date was the Bernhard web page and LDS records. Reverend Jesup gives the date of Jonathan/Jonathon's death as April 16, 1760. The Conley manuscript has it as April 18. Possibly all result from attempts to read a corroded headstone.

Return to the narrative

When did the Dibbles move to Indiana?

There are two widely divergent sources for the date of this first Dibble migration. The 1878 History of Goodhue County [MN] gives the date as the fall of 1832. Edward Jessup And His Descendants says the move took place in "about 1836 or 1837." No additional evidence has been gathered so far to support one date over the other. However, if the move was in the fall of 1837, it must have been especially hard on Sarah, who would have been very pregnant with her son Jonathan.

Return to the narrative

Where and when was Jonathan Dibble born?

Five sources have been found for the birthdate of Jonathan Dibble. One of them, "Jonathan Dibble.doc", a geneological report derived from the Lynn J. Bernhard website and provided by George A. Dibble III, gives the date as December 15, 1833, and while no birthplace is given, one of the original sources Bernhard cited was "Stamford, CT vital records". (Bernhard's other source is the infamous "Jessup Geneology".) This would seem an unimpeachable source, except the same Stamford records are also cited in that document for the birth of Jonathan's younger brother, Sylvanus, in 1840 in Indiana. It is, of course, unlikely that Stamford, CT officials would have recorded, or even known about, a son born in Indiana to a Stamford expatriate who had left at least three years earlier. Therefore, the citation for Jonathan's birth in 1833 is also suspect.

Three of the other four sources give 1837 as the year of birth, and one of them, Jonathan's obituary in the Cannon Falls (MN) Beacon, gives his birthplace as "Switzerland County, Indiana". The fifth source yields a birth year of 1838, by subtracting from his age when he died (39, in March 1877), which appears on his headstone.

Given the information so far available, the best guess seems to be that Jonathan was born in Indiana in 1837.

Return to the narrative

Where did John Dibble die?

Owing to the confusing geneological practice of stating place names as "[city], [county], [state]" and not informing the reader when "[city]" has been left out, this citation (also from "Jonathan Dibble.doc") allows for two possible death locations: One would be the town of Jefferson, IN, which was about 35 miles northwest of Indianapolis, or about 130 straight-line miles from the Dibble homestead. The other would be Jefferson County, IN, which was the next county to the west from what was then Dearborn or Switzerland County. If John died in the town of Jefferson, it becomes important to ask what he was doing in so distant a place just a few days after his wife gave birth to his last child. It seems unlikely that he would have made such a trip, so it is assumed that he died somewhere just over the county line to the west of his home.

Return to the narrative

When did which Dibbles come to Minnesota?

Dibbles have been recorded as living in Minnesota since 1809, long before the area was a state or anything more distinct than just part of the Louisiana Purchase. There were also Dibbles in Dodge and Olmsted Counties, just south of Cannon Falls' Goodhue County, and in Winona County, by the mid-1880s. All of those Minnesota Dibbles were probably descended from Robert Deeble, just as our line probably is, but the connection doesn't seem to be much closer than that.

Among the Dibbles we are most concerned with, there is some confusion as to who settled in Minnesota, and when.

It seems clear that Alonzo Dibble was in the Cannon Falls area in July 1854, because we have an eyewitness, Charles Parks, who met him on the trail between Red Wing and Cannon Falls as Alonzo was moving to his claim. Parks did not mention Jonathan, perhaps because he was only 16 at the time. (However, some sources say that Jonathan did not arrive until the fall of the following year.)

Beyond that, though, things get murky. Consider the brothers' land patents. Photographs of the actual patents from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) reveal the following:

Alonzo's original claim included the south half of the northwest quarter of section 24, and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter and northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 23, in township 112--160 acres--which would be the eastern half of the portion of the Alonzo Dibble tract shown in section 23 on the 1877 plat of Stanton Township, plus the central section of the portion shown in section 24 of that plat. This patent is dated 1856.

Jonathan claimed the north half of the southwest quarter of section 24, township 112--80 acres--which would be the area where School No. 7 appears on the 1877 plat, just south of Alonzo's land in that section (a location that tends to disprove a later arrival date for Jonathan, as the rapid influx of settlers would have made it unlikely that any land adjacant to his brother's claim would have still been available). This patent is dated 1858.

Jonathan also claimed the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 12, township 111--40 acres--which is several miles due south of the above two claims, in Warsaw Township not far from Sogn. This patent is dated 1871.

And, a Silas Dibble claimed the south half of the northeast quarter and north half of the southeast quarter of section 12, township 111--160 acres--which is just south of, and adjacant to, Jonathan's Warsaw Township claim. However, this patent is dated 1857.

We probably can ignore most of, and perhaps all of, the dates. All the patents are "pre-emption certificates", which means the settlers had "pre-empted" or occupied the land some time before filing a claim. Three of the patents refer to claims filed at the Red Wing land office, which did not open until August 1855, and we know Alonzo was already on the land over a year before that. The BLM also states that it was quite common for land patents to be issued, and dated, years after the claims were filed during this period in history, due to the enormous backlog of claims engendered by land rushes exactly like the one that took place in Goodhue County. The date of 1871 for Jonathan's second patent (which, unlike the others, was filed at the New Ulm land office well west of Cannon Falls) might still raise questions. However, by 1871 Goodhue County was well settled; it seems unlikely that there would have been any vacant land left to claim, which makes more attractive the theory that this claim was just processed very late.

Then there is the question of Silas Dibble. Jonathan's and Alonzo's brother Silas was 38 in the summer of 1854, he had five living children (one of the dead ones was also called Silas), and his wife was pregnant with another. He was successful as a riverboatman. Would he have traveled all the way to Minnesota under those circumstances, and if he did, why didn't Parks notice the crowd of kids around Alonzo, or Silas himself for that matter? Both Alonzo and Jonathan appear several times in the subsequent historical record of Cannon Falls and Goodhue County. Silas is never mentioned. We might conclude that he was simply one of the "other" Minnesota Dibbles who are not in our line. But there is the nagging fact that his claim was right next to Jonathan's in Warsaw Township, and it was occupied for some time before March 1858. This seems like too much of a coincidence to ignore.

As we shall see, Jonathan and a lot of other people left the Cannon Falls area not long after getting there. Perhaps Silas was one of them. But, given the difficulties of transporting a bunch of young kids and a pregnant woman almost a thousand miles up the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers in 1854, plus the fact that some of Silas's sons later served in the Civil War in Indiana units, another possibility emerges.

Alonzo was a young bachelor recently returned from an unsuccessful effort to make his fortune in the California goldfields. Jonathan was a teenager. These land claims were filed under the federal Cash Entry Act of 1820, which required grantees to purchase the land, either at public auction or for $1.25 per acre. Together, the younger brothers claimed at least $450 worth of land. Where did they get that kind of money? Perhaps the older, established Silas provided it, and in return the brothers also claimed a parcel for him, from whose prospective sale Silas expected to profit in the high-flying land market of the time?

Return to the narrative

Who was Ann Eliza Smith?

Four Ann or Ann E. or Ann Eliza Smiths have been found whose birthdates approximately match the information found on her headstone. Two of these have been ruled out as matches for Jonathan's wife. The most likely of the remaining Anns (if, indeed, any of them are the right person), is an Ann Smith who was born in "about 1837" in Versailles, Ripley County, Indiana. Versailles is about 20 - 25 miles northwest of the region the Dibbles inhabited. Her parents were John Wesley Smith and Mary M. Kennedy. This information, which comes from the LDS Family Search archives, is all we have on her. It is hoped that continuing inquiries will eventually turn up something more.

Return to the narrative

When did Jonathan return to Minnesota?

We have three sources for the date of Jonathan's return:

1. Jonathan's obituary in the Cannon Falls Beacon said he "has been a resident of this state ever since [his first arrival] with the exception of about four years."

2. A "Historic Note" dated 1899, probably also from the Beacon, which says, "Richard Dibble, of the firm of Dibble Bros. was born Nov. 1, 1862, at Rising Sun, Ind. and came to this village at two years of age." (reprinted in Roots and Wings by Connie Bickman [1996])

3. His son Dick's obituary in the Beacon, which says Dick came to Cannon Falls with his parents five years after his birth in November 1862.

The first source puts him back in Minnesota in 1864, assuming he left around the beginning of 1860. He probably left before then, but "about four years" leaves some leeway. The second source would have him returned by November 1864. The third source delays his return until 1867. However, we also have his military service, which close examination confirms was with a Minnesota unit, beginning in February 1865. This, with the other evidence, tips the balance to a return date of some time in 1864.

Return to the narrative

Where was Daniel Dibble born?

Daniel's obituary says he was born on a farm "near Cannon Falls". A "Historic Note" dated 1899, probably from the Cannon Falls Beacon, says he was "born in this village". The 1870 US Census shows Jonathan, Anna, Nathan, Dick and Minnie all living in Warsaw County, but doesn't mention Daniel, who was born the year before.

From this it makes sense to conclude that Daniel was probably born on the farm, but it may be that Jonathan had moved to the village by then while still retaining ownership of the farm. If that's the case, we don't know what happened to the farm later. It is not the same farm that Jonathan's son Dick used for beef production; Dick's farm was only about a half mile southeast of Cannon Falls on Spring Garden Road.

Return to the narrative

Ann Junior?

The record on this child is so confused that when she was born and to whom is little more than conjecture; only the fact that she lived, for a short time, is clear.

A man named Dalby recorded Minnesota cemetery records for historical purposes. He has the younger Ann's death as January 17, 1879, at the age of 3 years 9 months. The "Dalby List" is probably also one of the sources for a website called "Minnesota Cemetery Records", which gives the same information and notes that Ann is buried under the same headstone as Jonathan, his wife Ann, and another child whom we'll discuss later. However, a photocopy of the Cannon Falls Cemetery's own records (clearly compiled well after the child's death, as they are typewritten) gives the child's birthdate as January 17, 1870 and death date as January 26, 1870, just 9 days later.

If Dalby is right, then Ann Eliza Sr. was not the child's mother, because she died in 1873. Would Jonathan's second wife (allegedly Ann's sister) have wanted their first child named for his first wife? Perhaps. But both the Cannon Falls Cemetery record and the Minnesota Cemetery website give Ann Eliza as the girl's mother.

Handwritten records and corroded headstones are notoriously difficult to read. The preponderance of the evidence favors the child's birth, to her namesake, and death in 1870, but who knows, really?

Return to the narrative

Ella Who and When?

Different sources give Ella's family name as "Coplan" and "Coplin". The Goodhue County Cemetery records have Ella's father's surname as "Copeland" on her page even though they record the rest of the family as "Coplin". An email dated 9/22/2000 from Richard K. Dibble, citing Sila Flueger and the Red Wing Republican Eagle, spells it "Coplan". The Cannon Falls Schools 1880 graduation program has "Coplin". It's not clear how Ella herself spelled it. At any rate, geneological research indicates that these spellings are probably all variants of the same family name. Ella's birthdate is also in doubt. The Goodhue Cemetery records give December 20, 1864; the aforementioned email gives only "1865." Since we know only that Ella came to Cannon Falls when she was 11, this also affects the year in which her family arrived there, which could be anywhere from late December 1875 to sometime in 1877.

Return to the narrative

When did Sarah marry Dr. Ed?

The information we have so far is confusing on Sarah Dibble's and Hiram "Ed" Conley's marriage date. Historical Sketches of Cannon Falls 1854-1954 has them marrying in 1884. But a Cannon Falls Beacon "profile" from 1886 (reprinted in Roots and Wings) says Conley came to Cannon Falls from Waterville "last fall". It seems unlikely that Sarah and Ed could have met and married in Waterville during the time Sarah was away at college, given the distance between Waterville and the normal school in Winona, and anyway, Sarah is said to have resumed teaching in Cannon Falls after graduating from normal school and then to have quit again to get married. Given the short time-frame allowed by a fall 1885 return for Conley, one almost has to conclude either that he first met Sarah and got to know her while studying with his brother in 1881 or that they actually married in 1886 or later.

Whether they married in the fall of 1885 or after, as we shall see below, another source indicates that their first child was 6 years old in 1891. Allowing as much leeway as possible, if this is true the child would have had to be born no later than December 31, 1885, which would place her conception about 5 months before Ed returned to Cannon Falls. Something is clearly wrong here, somewhere.

Return to the narrative

Who was Casimir's Mother?

Information copied from old, faded handwritten records from St. Stanislaw's Church (Winona, MN) does not support this story. The information was provided to Bonnie Cattnach in a 1992 letter from Ben Schultz of the Winona Polish Museum. It shows Stephan marrying Mary Banacek (also spelled "Banaczek" and "Banachek") on June 3, 1904 in Poland, and gives Casimir's birthdate as March 3, 1905, a rather suspect exact nine months later. St. Stanislaw's seems frequently to have played fast and loose with vital records; birth records for some of Stephan's descendants contain given names different from those found on their birth certificates ("Bonita" for Bonnie Gatz and "Appolonia" for Opal Orzechowski, for example). This may simply reflect a tradition of bestowing special "baptismal names". Altered marriage dates, however, may indicate that church officials were skeptical of Stephan's story of a first wife and altered the record to avoid raising potentially embarassing questions. At any rate, the family is quite certain that Casimir was the child of Stephan's unknown first wife, and that Mary (referred to by St. Stan's as "Maryanna") was his stepmother.

Return to the narrative

Who Was Stephan Orzechowski?

The word "white" is associated with Stephan Orzechowski in the minds of many of his family. How this association came about, however, is not clear. Some family members assert that his real name, "Flakiewicz", translates as "White" in Russian or Polish. However, the Russian word for white would be spelled, in English, as "byely", and would be similar in Polish and other Slavic languages, so this explanation cannot be true. Other family members say his departure from the Russian army was related to the Bolshevik Revolution, and that perhaps he and his family were "White (anti-revolutionary)" Russians fighting the "Red" Bolsheviks. Tales that Stephan was "landed"--a member of the gentry or even, perhaps, of the minor Russian nobility--support this contention. However, the Russian Revolution broke out in February, 1917, and at that time it was a democratic revolution. The Bolsheviks did not take over until November (October by the old Russian calendar) of 1917, and the Russian Civil War between Whites and Reds began after that. This was between two and five years after Stephan is generally believed to have come to America. (Family sources give the year of immigration as about 1915; Stephan's daughter Angeline's obituary gives 1912.) On the other hand, there were several minor revolutionary incidents and revolts in Russia between 1905 and 1917. Many of these involved units of the Russian armed forces on both sides of the conflict, so Stephan's participation in revolutionary activity cannot be ruled out. A third possibility is that Stephan belonged to the Slavic ethnic group known as Byelorussians, or "white Russians", which is a distinct nationality, though closely related to Russians by language and culture. This is likely to remain a mystery, ensuring that Stephan and his descendants will always be safe from the Russian army.

Return to the narrative

What did Dick Dibble own and when did he own it?

The information collected so far doesn't allow for precision. At some future date, a review of deed transfers and other records in Goodhue County may provide better answers. In the meantime, the narrative is based on the following:

Dick's grandson Richard reports that "Dick did very well by selling meat to the Army during WWI and prior - which started him on the way of buying buildings in downtown Cannon Falls and later a farm to raise his own meat (without middlemen)...[Dick's wife] Bertha had a sister, Eve, and Eve's husband Ed [Wilson] was the local barber. I remember Dick setting him up in one of his buildings [in] downtown Cannon Falls, rent free."

From Cannon Falls - Remembered, published by the Dakota County Geneological Society: "Mr. E. [Eli Ellsworth, the grandfather of Dan Dibble's wife Isabelle Sanders] ... erected a frame store building on the north side of Mill St. seventy by sixty feet, two stories in height with one story for a living house. The site of this building is now occupied by the R. Dibble, Aug. Eklof and O. F. Peters block."

The Chronicles of Cannon Falls (1976) states that the Cannon Falls post office was located in the "Dibble Block" on Mill St. "(now Lampert Storage)" from 1915 to about 1925.

In 1886, the Cannon Falls Beacon reported that Tanner & Dibble occupied a 2-story frame building.

Heidi Holmes-Helgren, of the Cannon Falls Museum, reports, "I have a book called Roots and Wings... On page 138 the picture on the top right has a street scene from the late 1880's. It shows the names of the businesses but the one that you would be interested in is the saloon next to Scofield Drug store. This was owned by Kowitz's and later by the Dibbles for their meat store."

Let's start with this photo. (It appears on Page 6 of this site--"Big Farms, Little Towns on the Prairie"--as "West side of 4th. St. looking north from Main St. Cannon Falls, late 1800s".) The caption in Roots and Wings indicates that Dibble Bros. Butcher Shop stood about 4 buildings south of Mill St. Ms. Helgren, who says that Roots and Wings contains several inaccuracies, puts Dick's shop 5 buildings further south. None of the buildings in the photo is a 2-story frame building like that described in the Beacon. The more northerly candidate is brick and has only one story. Depending on how many windows each store had, the shop next to Scofield Drugs would also be brick and have either one or two stories. Of course, Dick's shop probably burned in the 1887 fire. No doubt he would have rebuilt using brick just as all the other merchants on the street did, but would he have downsized from two stories to one?

Earlier photos of the same block (including one displayed on Page 6 of this site and captioned, "Some of Cannon Falls' earliest businesses") show several frame buildings, and one, taken no later than 1878, shows part of a 2-story frame building north of Scofield's where Ms. Helgren puts the shop. This may later have been the site of Dibble and Tanner, but that building probably burned in the 1884 fire as well as its successor in 1887. The fires, of course, complicate things significantly; while many of the businesses on Fourth St. were rebuilt, they may well have occupied quite different "footprints" than they did before they burned.

If Ms. Helgren's statement that the Dibble Bros. shop originally housed Kowitz's saloon is correct, then the location occupied by Dibble Bros. in 1889 and thereafter would most likely not be the Geering shop that Dibble and Tanner bought in 1882. Geering had already been there for a few years, and Kowitz, who started his brewery in 1876, would most likely have started his saloon a few years later, after Geering's shop opened.

There are two saloons in the photo described by Ms. Helgren. One, whose owner is not identified by the caption, is north of Scofield's; the other, just north of the building the caption calls Dibble Bros., is said to belong to Ole Olson. That designation, however, may be just as erroneous as anything else in the book.

A photo that Roots and Wings says is from "the early 1900's" (on Page 8 of this site--"Between Two Wars"--as "West side of 4th. St. looking north from Main St. Cannon Falls, early 1900s") shows a barber pole outside the building that the late 1800s photo's Roots and Wings caption seems to indicate held Dibble Bros. This may have been Ed Wilson's barbershop, and if so, it lends creedence to the more northerly site as being a building Dick owned. And there is a photo from the 1930s (on Page 8 of this site, as "West side of 4th. St. looking south, Cannon Falls, 1930s") in which a shop about one door south of where the barber shop was in the early 1900s displays a sign that says "Quality Meats". This might be Dick's shop, though by then Dick may not have been running it.

Earlier in our narrative Kowitz's saloon is described as being next door to, and possibly in the same building with, Dick's shop. The above evidence neither decisively rules out that possibility nor definitively supports it. However, one could speculate that Dick's holdings first expanded after his father-in-law Ferdinand Kowitz's death in 1897. Kowitz's eldest son, Ferdinand Jr., was already dead and his other sons, George, aged 17 or 18, and Herman, 15 or 16, were too young to take on a business. His oldest daughter was Bertha, Dick's wife. Ferdinand may have left the saloon to Bertha and/or Dick, it being as close as next door to Dick's shop. Of course, Dick may have owned other buildings on Fourth Street, perhaps including any between his shop and the Kowitz saloon; we just don't know.

With income from the butcher shop and a tenant next door or down the street, Dick probably bought into Mill Street next. The precise location or extent of his holdings there aren't clear either, but they were on the north side of the street between the Little Cannon River bridge and the First National Bank (which occupied the site of the early Ellsworth House hotel). This distance is perhaps a bit longer than most Cannon Falls city blocks. A photo from around 1920 (judging from the cars) shows a building with a sign on its roof that says "Lampert [unreadable]" on Mill St. just east of the bridge. This area was just a few doors north and around the corner from the butcher shop. We can comfortably assume that Dick owned this property by 1915, when the Post Office was moved there, but he may have bought it well before then.

It was probably well after he bought the Mill St. "block" that Dick acquired the cattle farm southeast of town on Spring Garden Road, and perhaps as late as after the end of World War I, as his namesake suggests.

Return to the narrative

Where and when did Archie Dibble serve?

The only record we have for Archie's military service is his Honorable Discharge paper. This document reports simply that he was wounded on October 3, 1918 and that the last unit he was assigned to was Company A, 7th. US Engineers. Our narrative assumes this was the only unit he served with, but that could be wrong.

If it's not, then a larger problem is presented by the date of his wounding. The 7th. Engineers were attached to the 5th. Division. The 5th. was involved in both the St. Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne offensives. However, several sources concur that the 5th. Division was taken off the line after St. Mihiel, on September 16 or 17, and did not return to the front until October 11 or 12, when it joined the post-Argonne phase of the offensive. If all this information is correct, then Archie would not have been wounded in combat. However, he received a Purple Heart medal, which can only be awarded for an injury caused by enemy action.

There are a few possible solutions to this puzzle. The Meuse-Argonne campaign began on September 26, and Pershing's forces began drawing on their reserves almost immediately. While the 5th. Division is not recorded as being part of the designated reserve contingent for that operation, it may be that men were drawn from it anyway, and Archie could have been one of them. A second possibility is that Archie's unit, while not on the front line, may not have been moved very far back while it waited for reinforcements and provisions. A stray bullet, or more likely an artillery bombardment shell, might have found its way to him behind the lines. It may also be that an error was made on Archie's discharge papers. Suppose the wrong month was entered and the wound occurred on November 3. Archie's unit, the 7th. Engineers, was definitely in combat then, having just built a bridge across the Meuse River and crossed to the east bank where withering German fire pinned them and several brigades of infantry down for a full day.

Return to the narrative

Where did Herman Kowitz die?

Herman's obituary, probably in the Cannon Falls Beacon, says he died at Forsythe, MT, which is about 90 miles east of Great Falls. The less-reliable Roots and Wings says he was shot in Hysham, MT, some 60 miles northeast of Billings. While it's certainly possible that he was shot in one town and died in another, these two towns are a good 100 miles apart, and there were no medivac helicopters, and probably not even a motor ambulance, to take him from one to the other. In short, we don't really know where this happened.

Return to the narrative